Companies, regulatory mechanisms, products and court decisions. Each object is treated for what it shows of decision delegated to autonomous systems.
Each kit pairs a reference case with an incident. Students compare two trajectories on the same ground: what held on one side, what gave way on the other, and which card of the standard names the gap.
An organisation that named its autonomy levels, its stopping points and the person answerable for delegated decisions.
A situation where the decision escaped the frame, documented by public sources.
The ACF® cards used to name the gap, without reconstructing what the organisation did internally.
The rule of the collection fits in one sentence: we read what is public, we do not guess what is not.
The Playbook and ACF in Action are not read the same way. That distinction is what protects the credibility of the second.
Publications and kits are currently served from the ACF workspace. The link opens the full collection.
Open the collection ↗The publications combine with the 45 toolkit cards and the Manual. The whole set is free for teaching and non-profit use.
Teachers page →